Interactive Discussions
TUESDAY, AUGUST 22 at 7:30 AM
Table 1: Getting It Right—The Future of  at-Home Diagnostics
Charudutt Shah, Chief Business Officer, Genomtec
Home-based diagnostics enable patients  or consumers to conduct different types of tests directly at home. Often these  test kits are for known health conditions, can they ALSO be effectively used  for diagnosing a previously undiagnosed medical issue?
- What tests/parameters or       syndromes are best suited for at-home diagnostics? 
 - As home testing grows from       nascent trend to an emerging trend – will reimbursement impede patient       access?
 - How do we ensure that       technologies are fool-proof to allow for optimal “do it yourself”       testing?
 - What are some key success factors       for self-testing?
 - Successfully managing the retail       aspects of “at-home diagnostics”
 
Table 2: Saliva as a Sample Type for the  Detection and Surveillance of Respiratory Pathogens
Anne Wyllie, PhD, Research Scientist, Epidemiology, Yale  School of Public Health; Principal Investigator, SalivaDirect Initiative
- Evidence in the literature       supporting saliva as a reliable sample type for the detection of       respiratory pathogens
 - Key considerations for working       with this non-traditional sample type
 - Insights gained from the COVID-19       response: self-collection, sample stability, simplified testing methods
 - Reasons to incorporate saliva       into your laboratory or surveillance systems, particularly in low-resource       settings
 
 
Table 3: Putting Together a Wishlist for Alternative US FDA CDx Regulations
Dun Liang, PhD, Executive Director, Regulatory Affairs, Companion Diagnostics, Loxo@Lilly
- What are the major challenges and pain points within the current CDx regulatory framework?
 - Will the proposed FDA/OCE CDx pilot program effectively address the existing pain points?
 - What practical aspects should the CDx pilot program consider to improve patient access to testing while ensuring reliability and accuracy?
 
Table 4: Impact of EU IVDR on Biomarker-Driven Clinical Trials: Past, Present, and Future
Vihanga Pahalawatta, PhD, Associate Director, Regulatory Affairs Device and Combination Products, AbbVie, Inc.
Jai Pandey, PhD, Head, Global Device Regulatory IVD/CDx and Digital Health, Sanofi
- What are the key challenges and potential mitigation strategies?
 - What are some lessons learned and best practices?
 
 
Table 5: MCED vs Single Organ Detection: Pros  and Cons of Each
Lynn Sorbara, PhD, Program Director, Cancer Biomarkers  Research Group, National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH
- Cost-effectiveness
 - Post-test decision-making
 - Patient compliance       
 - Rare cancer detections
 
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 23 AT 7:30 am
Table 1: FDA Update
Albine K. Martin, PhD,  Executive-in-Residence, BioHealth Innovation; Entrepreneur-in-Residence, Johns  Hopkins University
Gail Radcliffe, PhD, President, Radcliffe Consulting, Inc.
- EUA to 510(k) transition
 - OTC test requirements
 - Multiplex assays
 - IVD clinical study designs
 - Overlapping regulatory strategy       with the business case
 
Table 2: Saliva as a Sample Type for the  Detection and Surveillance of Respiratory Pathogens
Anne Wyllie, PhD, Research Scientist, Epidemiology, Yale  School of Public Health; Principal Investigator, SalivaDirect Initiative
- Evidence in the literature       supporting saliva as a reliable sample type for the detection of       respiratory pathogens
 - Key considerations for working       with this non-traditional sample type
 - Insights gained from the COVID-19       response: self-collection, sample stability, simplified testing methods
 - Reasons to incorporate saliva       into your laboratory or surveillance systems, particularly in low-resource       settings
 
Table 3: The Role of Government Reimbursement  in Encouraging (or Discouraging) Innovation in Diagnostic Testing
John F. Warren, Owner, Gettysburg  Healthcare Consultants
- Diagnostic technology continues       to evolve, but government reimbursement policies have not       fundamentally changed since the 1990s. To what extent should we       question the viability and effectiveness of employing policies that were       formulated three decades ago in a market that is constantly undergoing       rapid transformations?
 - In what ways can government       reimbursement strategies for diagnostic testing be optimized to strike a       balance between incentivizing innovation and ensuring accessibility and       affordability for patients, considering the evolving nature of healthcare       technologies and the need for continuous advancements in diagnostic       capabilities?
 - What potential consequences could       arise from either encouraging or discouraging innovation through updated       reimbursement policies?
 
Table 4: Coverage and Reimbursement of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP)
Lauren Feldman, Vice President and Head, Value, Access, and Pricing, ADVI
- Leveraging key opportunities and tackling challenges for coverage & reimbursement
 - Capitalizing on recent successes
 - Determining expectations for new Genomic Sequencing Procedure CPT Codes
 
 
Table 5: Pre-Competitive Collaboration for  Early Cancer Detection
Lauren Leiman, Executive Director,  BLOODPAC Consortium
Lynn Sorbara, PhD, Program Director, Cancer Biomarkers Research Group, National  Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH
- Opportunities for pre-competitive collaboration                
 - Examples of current collaborative efforts                
 - Challenges for commercial and non-commercial organizations
 
Table 6: Congressional Legislation to Facilitate Medicare Coverage of MCEDs
Jonathan Cohen, President & CEO,  20/20 GeneSystems
Stephen Ezell, Vice President, Global Innovation Policy, ITIF IT &  Innovation Foundation
- Validation clinical trials for early detection could still take years                
 - Legislative efforts to promote or require coverage could be a game-changer   
 - Update on current and potential legislative initiatives
 
Table 7: Differing Strategies; First Targeting  Higher-Risk Patients or General Population Screening
Megan P. Hall, PhD, Vice President,  Medical Affairs, GRAIL LLC
Sudhir Srivastava, PhD, Chief, Cancer Biomarkers Research Group, NIH NCI
- Algorithms for analysis are undergoing constant revision and improvement
 - The end goal should be MCEDs that can be used in the general population
 - Should testing in higher-risk cohorts be a stepping stone to broader general use?
 
 
Table 8: Looking into the Future of  Point-of-Care and OTC Testing
Jordan S. Laser, MD, Principal and  Founder, Laser Laboratory Consulting
- What are some current trends you       are seeing in the point-of-care space?
 - In a post-pandemic world, is the       push to OTC still progressing, or has it slowed down?
 - What are the next big diagnostics       to hit the point-of-care market?
 
Table 9: Taking a Closer  Look at Novel and Upcoming Point-of-Care Testing and Interpretation
Maikel Boot, PhD, Technical Director,  PreScouter, Inc.
- The use of AI/algorithms for       results interpretation on point-of-care devices
 - Reagent-free point-of-care       diagnostics
 - New biosensors (e.g.,       graphene-based)
 - At-home sample collection,       mail-in vs. at-home testing: which one is the future?